Subject: Do You Own A House?
I hope this can be refuted by one of you wizards.Scary as all get out if true.
I checked this out at Snopes.com and apparently it is true.
What is happening to our country and our rights????
Pass this on to everyone on your e-list…pass it across America !
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Don't want to be bothered with "Political stuff?" You'd better read this one. It will come as a huge shock to you if you aren't informed as to what Obama is up to, and apparently it has already passed one hurdle. It will take very little now to put it into actual law!! YOU'D BETTER WAKE UP AMERICA !!!! So you think you live in a free country, boy have you got a surprise coming.
A License Required for your HOUSE?
If you own your home you really need to check this out. At the end of this email is the Google link to verify. If the country thinks the housing market is depressed now, wait until everyone sees this; no one will be buying homes in the future.
We encourage you to read the provisions of the Cap and Trade Bill that has passed the House of Representatives and being considered by the Senate. We are ready to join the next march on Washington ! This Congress and whoever on their staffs that write this junk are truly out to destroy the middle class of the U.S.A .....
A License will be required for your house...no longer just for cars and mobile homes....Thinking about selling your house. Take a look at H.R. 2454 (Cap and Trade bill). This is unbelievable! Only the beginning from this administration! Home owners take note & tell your friends and relatives who are home owners!
Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Cap and Trade Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. H.R. 2454, the "Cap & Trade" bill passed by the House of Representatives, if it is also passed by the Senate, will be the largest tax increase any of us has ever experienced.
The Congressional Budget Office (supposedly non-partisan) estimates that in just a few years the average cost to every family of four will be $6,800 per year. No one is excluded. However, once the lower classes feel the pinch in their wallets, you can be sure these voters get a tax refund (even if they pay no taxes at all) to offset this new cost. Thus, you Mr. And Mrs. Middle Class have to pay even more since additional tax dollars will be needed
to bail out everyone else..
But wait. This awful bill (that no one in Congress has actually read) has many more surprises in it. Probably the worst one is this: A year from now you won't be able to sell your house. Yes, you read that right.
The caveat is (there always is a caveat) that if you have enough money to make required major upgrades to your home, then you can sell it. But, if not, then forget it. Even pre-fabricated homes ("mobile homes") are included. In effect, this bill prevents you from selling your home without the permission of the EPA administrator.
To get this permission,you will have to have the energy efficiency of your home measured. Then the government will tell you what your new energy efficiency requirement is and you will be forced to make modifications to your home under the retrofit provisions of this Act to comply with the new energy and water efficiency requirements.
Then you will have to get your home measured again and get a license (called a "label" in the Act) that must be posted on your property to show what your efficiency rating is; sort of like the Energy Star efficiency rating label on your refrigerator or air conditioner. If you don't get a high enough rating, you can't sell.
And, the EPA administrator is authorized to raise the standards every year, even above the automatic energy efficiency increases built into the Act. The EPA administrator, appointed by the President, will run the Cap & Trade program (AKA the "American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009") and is authorized to make any future changes to the regulations and standards he/she alone determines to be in the government's best interest. Requirements are set low initially so the bill will pass Congress; then the Administrator can set much tougher new standards every year.
The Act itself contains annual required increases in energy efficiency for private and commercial residences and buildings. However, the EPA administrator can set higher standards at any time. Sect. 202 Building Retrofit Program mandates a national retrofit program to increase the energy efficiency of all existing homes across America .
Beginning 1 year after enactment of the Act, you won't be able to sell your home unless you retrofit it to comply with the energy and water efficiency standards of this Act. You had better sell soon, because the standards will be raised each year and will be really hard (I.e., ex$pen$ive) to meet in a few years. Oh, goody!
The Act allows the government to give you a grant of several thousand dollars to comply with the retrofit program requirements IF you meet certain energy efficiency levels. But, wait, the State can set additional requirements on who qualifies to receive the grants. You should expect requirements such as "can't have an income of more than $50K per year", "home selling price can't be more than $125K", or anything else to target the upper middle class (and that's YOU) and prevent them from qualifying for the grants.
Most of us won't get a dime and will have to pay the entire cost of the retrofit out of our own pockets. More transfer of wealth, more "change you can believe in." Sect. 204 Building Energy Performance Labeling Program establishes a labeling program that for each individual residence will
identify the achieved energy efficiency performance for "at least 90 percent of the residential market within 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act."
This means that within 5 years 90% of all residential homes in the U.S. must be measured and labeled. The EPA administrator will get $50M each year to enforce the labeling program. The Secretary of the Department of Energy will get an additional $20M each year to help enforce the labeling program. Some of this money will, of course, be spent on coming up with tougher standards each year...
Oh, the label will be like a license for your car. You will be required to post the label in a conspicuous location in your home and will not be allowed to sell your home without having this label. And, just like your car license, you will probably be required to get a new label every so often - maybe every year.
But, the government estimates the cost of measuring the energy efficiency of your home should only cost about $200 each time. Remember what they said about the auto smog inspections when they first started: that in California it would only cost $15.
That was when the program started. Now the cost is about $50 for the inspection and certificate; a 333% increase. Expect the same from the home labeling program. Sect. 304 Greater Energy Efficiency in Building Codes establishes new energy efficiency guidelines for the National Building Code and mandates at 304(d) that 1 year after enactment of this Act, all state and local jurisdictions must adopt the National Building Code energy efficiency provisions or must obtain a certification from the federal government that their state and/or local codes have been brought into full compliance with the National Building Code energy efficiency standards.
CHECK OUT Just a few of the sites;
Cap and Trade: A License Required for your Home http://www.nachi.org/forum/f14/cap-and-trade-license-required-your-home-44750/
HR2454 American Clean Energy & Security Act: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-2454
Cap & Trade A license required for your home: http://www.prisonplanet.com/cap-and-trade-a-license-required-for-your-home.html
Cap and trade is a license to cheat and steal:
http://www.sfexaminer.com/opinion/columns/oped_contributors/Cap-and-trade-is-a-license-to-cheat-and-steal-45371937.html
Cap and Trade: A License Required for your Home: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2393940/posts
Thinking about selling you House? Look at HR 2454:
http://www.federalobserver.com/2009/10/01/thinking-about-selling-your-house-a-look-at-h-r-2454-cap-and-trade-bill/
www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=A+License+required+
for+your+home-+Cap+and+Trade&btnG=Google+Search
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Friday, April 23, 2010
Hate.
It seems there is a lot of hate in the world today. Ok, so there has always been a lot of hate, but with ever increasing media availability, hate seems to spread quicker than ever.
I am no fan of president obama. I do not like his politics, i do not like his wife's beliefs, i do not like his political history and how he came to reside in the white house.
Notice i didn't say "I hate". Hate is too strong of a word. I don't hate the man or his wife. I just don't like them. It is an opinion.
Not long ago someone on the interweb created a "funny" mentioning the death of several celebrities that died too young, and that the poster "loved" them. At the end of the post is a note that he or she loves obama too.
This is an indirect desire to see the president die.
Outside of extremists who hate the man for either his race or his politics probably find this a desired event. Realistic people, regardless of politics, should understand that bottom line it just isn't funny and it says something about the type of person they are.
I am all for freedom of speech. In fact i have served my country and defended people's right to it.
What i would love to see is people exercise the right to being intelligent and thoughtful in that speech.
If you don't like the president's politics and policys and beliefs, it is better to educate yourself, form opinions and bring them out for the world to see in a mature and insightful method.
I personally would love to see the entire left get voted out of office in the midterms and the next presidential election, but what i don't want to see is idiocy from those who share my political beliefs.
It gives ME a bad name.
Be better than that folks.
I am no fan of president obama. I do not like his politics, i do not like his wife's beliefs, i do not like his political history and how he came to reside in the white house.
Notice i didn't say "I hate". Hate is too strong of a word. I don't hate the man or his wife. I just don't like them. It is an opinion.
Not long ago someone on the interweb created a "funny" mentioning the death of several celebrities that died too young, and that the poster "loved" them. At the end of the post is a note that he or she loves obama too.
This is an indirect desire to see the president die.
Outside of extremists who hate the man for either his race or his politics probably find this a desired event. Realistic people, regardless of politics, should understand that bottom line it just isn't funny and it says something about the type of person they are.
I am all for freedom of speech. In fact i have served my country and defended people's right to it.
What i would love to see is people exercise the right to being intelligent and thoughtful in that speech.
If you don't like the president's politics and policys and beliefs, it is better to educate yourself, form opinions and bring them out for the world to see in a mature and insightful method.
I personally would love to see the entire left get voted out of office in the midterms and the next presidential election, but what i don't want to see is idiocy from those who share my political beliefs.
It gives ME a bad name.
Be better than that folks.
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Day 2.
Starting to get hungry. Must eat. Oh wait, nevermind, i stopped at McDonalds on the way into work.....
This volcano got me to thinking that it might be a conspiracy. Remember Mount St Helen when it blew? I don't remember any change to air traffic. Of course it could be that we just didn't know or more likely didn't care and flew through it anyway.
So, for the record, volcanos suck. Or i should say they blow.
btw props to my friend Alice for predicting a volcanic eruption. When all of those earthquakes were going on, she said that the next event would be a volcano!
This volcano got me to thinking that it might be a conspiracy. Remember Mount St Helen when it blew? I don't remember any change to air traffic. Of course it could be that we just didn't know or more likely didn't care and flew through it anyway.
So, for the record, volcanos suck. Or i should say they blow.
btw props to my friend Alice for predicting a volcanic eruption. When all of those earthquakes were going on, she said that the next event would be a volcano!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Is this thing on?
Things that i cannot stand...
1. Volcanos
2. People that know their flight leaves at 5pm and show up at the airport at 445pm and bitch about the security line and want to blame their admin and the travel agent.
3. Traffic
4. Those who refuse to flush the urinal after using it, because they just KNOW that i should see it.
5. Toilet paper hung under. Everyone with common sense knows it goes over.
6. lists.
1. Volcanos
2. People that know their flight leaves at 5pm and show up at the airport at 445pm and bitch about the security line and want to blame their admin and the travel agent.
3. Traffic
4. Those who refuse to flush the urinal after using it, because they just KNOW that i should see it.
5. Toilet paper hung under. Everyone with common sense knows it goes over.
6. lists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)